It was January of 2009 when I wrote this post. The gist of it was bloggers were getting into a bad habit of putting question marks in the titles of their posts. If they weren’t sure something was factual or if they wanted to drum up click-throughs and get more commenters, they’d pose a question. Basically, a question mark was lazy journalism. Instead of me writing some thoughts about a new pair of headphones on this blog, I’d instead write “Is this the last pair of headphones I ever buy?” No, there’s no way those would be the last ones I’d ever buy. I’m 29. Do I really want to insinuate that these headphones will last 50 years? I’m not a jerk but this is a real headline bloggers use often.
I close out that 2009 post with:
CNN.com doesn’t have any posts with question marks so why should you be able to?
Well, today I visited CNN.com as I do once a week to validate an assumption of mine and I noticed a few posts with question marks in them. I did a CTRL+F for “?” and found 14 headlines with question marks.
Could it be? The slow-decay of real journalism over the last 7 years where these Internet-raised J-school drop-outs have graduated from Gawker to CNN and have infected real media with the question mark epidemic.
Sigh.
For those wondering what I search for on CNN, I do a weekly self-poll where I visit CNN.com and do a search for Trump and then a search for Clinton and compare how many matches there are. Trump has been winning for 6 months. Things he says generates far more page-views for CNN than things that Clinton says. The media has propped him up since the beginning, first as a joke then as a running-joke since they have to keep covering it since fair-press means the GOP nominee for President shouldn’t be completely ignored. He has double the amount of posts about him over his opponent yet he’s losing in most polls.
Discover more from Adam Chandler's Blog
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.